Reviewer Scorecard
Updated July 3, 2008
Today we unveil a new design for our reviewer scorecard. Gone are three pages of scorecards, updated at various intervals over time. Our new design features all reviewers through time save those who reviewed fewer than ten books. The first part of the table reflects current review staff. The next part reflects staff who no longer review, but who continue to perform a function at AAR, such as co-writing the ATBF column, acting as our publisher liaison, etc. The final section of the table features former staff who no longer are involved at AAR.
Currently there are more than 7,000 reviews in our reviews database, and more than 6,500 were reviewed by our staff. Not counted in the 6,500+ figure are those "extracurricular" Desert Isle Keeper reviews of older books that our staff reviewed.
This page is useful in a variety of ways. For instance, if you find that you tend to like books better, than, say, Blythe, you might find yourself more in tune with, say, Rachel. And vice versa. (We also recommend your visiting our staff profiles to assist in this.) What is also clearly indicated is that very nearly one-half of the books we've read and reviewed, we've found to be good or great. Roughly 20% of the books we've read and reviewed were found to be below average, which we believe contradicts the idea that we're too tough on the books we read, particularly when compared to the books we've graded as B's or A's, which add up to nearly 50%.
| Currently Reviewing |
A's |
|
B's |
|
C's |
|
D's |
|
F's |
|
Total |
| Laurie Likes Books, publisher |
17 |
9% |
|
91 |
47% |
|
68 |
35% |
|
28 |
15% |
|
9 |
5% |
|
202 |
| Blythe, managing editor |
20 |
4% |
|
161 |
33% |
|
185 |
38% |
|
96 |
20% |
|
20 |
4% |
|
482 |
| Ellen, senior editor |
35 |
5% |
|
280 |
41% |
|
234 |
35% |
|
103 |
15% |
|
26 |
4% |
|
678 |
| Sandy, senior reviews editor |
25 |
9% |
|
124 |
43% |
|
87 |
30% |
|
42 |
15% |
|
8 |
3% |
|
286 |
| Rachel, lists editor/senior reviewer |
15 |
6% |
|
133 |
49% |
|
91 |
33% |
|
29 |
11% |
|
4 |
1% |
|
272 |
| Cheryl, reviews editor |
5 |
3% |
|
62 |
42% |
|
49 |
33% |
|
30 |
20% |
|
3 |
2% |
|
149 |
| Lynn, reviews editor |
6 |
2% |
|
131 |
54% |
|
87 |
36% |
|
18 |
7% |
|
2 |
1% |
|
244 |
| Heather, senior reviewer |
6 |
11% |
|
27 |
47% |
|
16 |
28% |
|
7 |
12% |
|
1 |
2% |
|
57 |
| Kate C, senior reviewer |
4 |
6% |
|
32 |
50% |
|
20 |
31% |
|
8 |
13% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
64 |
| Lisa, senior reviewer |
14 |
16% |
|
34 |
39% |
|
19 |
22% |
|
18 |
21% |
|
2 |
2% |
|
87 |
| Lea, senior reviewer |
8 |
12% |
|
32 |
47% |
|
21 |
31% |
|
6 |
9% |
|
1 |
1% |
|
68 |
| Jane J, senior reviewer |
13 |
7% |
|
81 |
41% |
|
67 |
34% |
|
35 |
18% |
|
4 |
2% |
|
200 |
| Andi, reviewer |
1 |
2% |
|
22 |
46% |
|
20 |
42% |
|
5 |
10% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
48 |
| Carolyn, reviewer |
3 |
14% |
|
9 |
41% |
|
7 |
32% |
|
3 |
14% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
22 |
| Jane G, facebook admin/reviewer |
5 |
11% |
|
23 |
52% |
|
10 |
23% |
|
6 |
14% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
44 |
| Linda, reviewer |
4 |
10% |
|
20 |
47% |
|
12 |
28% |
|
6 |
14% |
|
1 |
2% |
|
43 |
| Rike, reviewer |
5 |
12% |
|
23 |
53% |
|
11 |
26% |
|
4 |
9% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
43 |
| LinnieGayl, reviewer |
2 |
9% |
|
9 |
41% |
|
5 |
23% |
|
5 |
23% |
|
1 |
5% |
|
22 |
| Jessica, reviewer |
4 |
15% |
|
11 |
42% |
|
5 |
19% |
|
5 |
19% |
|
1 |
4% |
|
26 |
| Still at AAR, or associated, but no longer reviewing |
| Anne Marble, ATBF columnist |
6 |
11% |
|
19 |
36% |
|
18 |
34% |
|
8 |
15% |
|
2 |
4% |
|
53 |
| Robin Uncapher, ATBF columnist |
7 |
10% |
|
26 |
36% |
|
22 |
30% |
|
13 |
18% |
|
5 |
7% |
|
73 |
| Teresa Galloway, MySpace admin |
1 |
3% |
|
13 |
41% |
|
6 |
19% |
|
10 |
31% |
|
2 |
6% |
|
32 |
| Kate Garrabrant, publisher liaison |
2 |
8% |
|
11 |
46% |
|
1 |
4% |
|
9 |
38% |
|
1 |
4% |
|
24 |
| Joan Lee, What We're Reading (at AAR After Hours ) |
1 |
3% |
|
13 |
15% |
|
15 |
41% |
|
8 |
22% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
37 |
| Retired |
| Marianne Stillings, senior editor |
20 |
8% |
|
86 |
36% |
|
74 |
31% |
|
33 |
14% |
|
23 |
10% |
|
236 |
| Nora Armstrong, editor |
14 |
10% |
|
62 |
45% |
|
36 |
26% |
|
17 |
12% |
|
9 |
7% |
|
138 |
| Jennifer Keirans, editor |
17 |
6% |
|
103 |
38% |
|
80 |
29% |
|
60 |
22% |
|
14 |
5% |
|
274 |
| Lori-Anne Cohen, senior reviewer |
4 |
6% |
|
27 |
41% |
|
22 |
33% |
|
11 |
17% |
|
2 |
3% |
|
66 |
| Rebecca Ekmark, senior reviewer |
4 |
7% |
|
25 |
42% |
|
13 |
22% |
|
16 |
27% |
|
2 |
3% |
|
60 |
| Megan Frampton, senior reviewer |
4 |
7% |
|
22 |
37% |
|
20 |
34% |
|
10 |
17% |
|
3 |
5% |
|
59 |
| Heidi Haglin, senior reviewer |
12 |
10% |
|
47 |
40% |
|
23 |
20% |
|
21 |
18% |
|
14 |
12% |
|
117 |
| Colleen McMahon, senior reviewer |
9 |
12% |
|
32 |
42% |
|
19 |
25% |
|
14 |
18% |
|
2 |
3% |
|
76 |
| Mary Novak, senior reviewer |
6 |
9% |
|
26 |
40% |
|
21 |
32% |
|
9 |
14% |
|
3 |
5% |
|
65 |
| Andrea Pool, senior reviewer |
20 |
11% |
|
80 |
43% |
|
39 |
37% |
|
17 |
9% |
|
1 |
1% |
|
187 |
| Jennifer Schendel, senior reviewer |
11 |
10% |
|
55 |
48% |
|
24 |
21% |
|
17 |
15% |
|
8 |
7% |
|
115 |
| Laurie Shallah, senior reviewer |
9 |
9% |
|
39 |
39% |
|
42 |
42% |
|
7 |
7% |
|
2 |
2% |
|
99 |
| Lori Sowell, senior reviewer |
1 |
2% |
|
39 |
63% |
|
21 |
34% |
|
1 |
2% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
62 |
| Claudia Terrones, senior reviewer |
7 |
5% |
|
64 |
45% |
|
40 |
28% |
|
26 |
18% |
|
6 |
4% |
|
143 |
| Leigh Thomas, senior reviewer |
7 |
2% |
|
185 |
42% |
|
207 |
47% |
|
36 |
8% |
|
3 |
1% |
|
438 |
| Katarina Wikholm, senior reviewer |
2 |
3% |
|
15 |
21% |
|
35 |
49% |
|
16 |
23% |
|
3 |
4% |
|
71 |
Liz Zink, senior reviewer |
26 |
13% |
|
77 |
39% |
|
51 |
26% |
|
35 |
18% |
|
7 |
4% |
|
196 |
| Deb Barber, reviewer |
10 |
33% |
|
12 |
40% |
|
8 |
27% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
30 |
| Catherine Bishop, reviewer |
1 |
9% |
|
4 |
36% |
|
2 |
18% |
|
3 |
27% |
|
1 |
9% |
|
11 |
| Sybil Cook, reviewer |
3 |
14% |
|
10 |
45% |
|
5 |
23% |
|
4 |
18% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
22 |
| Noelle Leslie de la Cruz, reviewer |
2 |
7% |
|
9 |
31% |
|
10 |
34% |
|
3 |
21% |
|
2 |
7% |
|
29 |
| Shelley Dodge, reviewer/pollster |
2 |
11% |
|
7 |
39% |
|
5 |
28% |
|
2 |
11% |
|
2 |
11% |
|
18 |
| Bev Forehand-Anderson, reviewer |
5 |
31% |
|
8 |
50% |
|
3 |
19% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
16 |
Sharal Heinemann, reviewer |
0 |
0% |
|
6 |
55% |
|
1 |
9% |
|
3 |
27% |
|
1 |
9% |
|
11 |
| Keisha Hudson, reviewer |
3 |
10% |
|
18 |
58% |
|
7 |
23% |
|
2 |
6% |
|
1 |
3% |
|
31 |
| Maria K, reviewer |
2 |
8% |
|
9 |
36% |
|
9 |
36% |
|
4 |
16% |
|
1 |
4% |
|
25 |
| Diana Ketterer, reviewer |
2 |
5% |
|
16 |
37% |
|
21 |
49% |
|
4 |
9% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
43 |
| Marguerite Kraft, reviewer |
2 |
5% |
|
10 |
27% |
|
19 |
51% |
|
5 |
14% |
|
1 |
3% |
|
37 |
Anthony Langford, reviewer |
2 |
8% |
|
5 |
21% |
|
7 |
29% |
|
6 |
25% |
|
4 |
17% |
|
24 |
| Alina Laurie, reviewer |
0 |
0% |
|
5 |
38% |
|
6 |
46% |
|
2 |
15% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
13 |
Mary Ann Lien, reviewer |
6 |
14% |
|
16 |
36% |
|
15 |
34% |
|
4 |
9% |
|
3 |
7% |
|
44 |
| Nicole Miale, reviewer |
1 |
3% |
|
14 |
44% |
|
12 |
38% |
|
5 |
16% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
32 |
| Donna Newman, reviewer |
8 |
28% |
|
8 |
28% |
|
6 |
21% |
|
5 |
17% |
|
2 |
7% |
|
29 |
| Ha Nguyen, reviewer |
1 |
5% |
|
10 |
50% |
|
5 |
25% |
|
3 |
15% |
|
1 |
5% |
|
20 |
| Kelly Parker, reviewer |
4 |
12% |
|
16 |
48% |
|
6 |
18% |
|
5 |
15% |
|
2 |
6% |
|
33 |
| Christine Peterson, reviewer |
0 |
0% |
|
13 |
42% |
|
11 |
35% |
|
6 |
19% |
|
1 |
3% |
|
31 |
| Anne Ritter, reviewer |
1 |
3% |
|
9 |
28% |
|
9 |
28% |
|
10 |
31% |
|
3 |
9% |
|
32 |
| Dee Sains, reviewer |
0 |
0% |
|
16 |
43% |
|
12 |
32% |
|
7 |
19% |
|
2 |
5% |
|
37 |
| Kate (aka Kathryn) Smith, reviewer |
3 |
6% |
|
20 |
42% |
|
11 |
23% |
|
11 |
23% |
|
3 |
6% |
|
48 |
| TaKiesha Smith, reviewer |
4 |
9% |
|
25 |
54% |
|
12 |
26% |
|
4 |
9% |
|
1 |
2% |
|
46 |
| Monica Schwarze, reviewer |
3 |
17% |
|
5 |
28% |
|
4 |
22% |
|
3 |
17% |
|
3 |
17% |
|
18 |
| Candy Tan, reviewer |
1 |
3% |
|
10 |
33% |
|
11 |
37% |
|
6 |
20% |
|
2 |
7% |
|
30 |
| Jeanne W, reviewer |
3 |
7% |
|
21 |
48% |
|
18 |
41% |
|
2 |
5% |
|
0 |
0% |
|
44 |
| |
|
Totals
|
461 |
7% |
|
2711 |
39% |
|
2139 |
30% |
|
969 |
14% |
|
257 |
4% |
|
6537 |
The total percentages were derived by dividing the total number of reviews for each grade (sans those extracurricular reviews) by the total reviews counted for each AAR reviewer (not included are reviewers with fewer than ten reviews).
|
 |
To comment about our reviewers and grading on our reviews forum |
|