| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Eliza
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What I find interesting is that the cover quotes for this book are by Eloisa James and Elizabeth Hoyt, two authors who are tops with me for their crisp, clear, clean writing styles--along with Lauren Willig and Diana Gabaldon, who I also love for the same reason.
By way of contrast, the cover quotes for "At Your Pleasure" are by Liz Carlyle and AAR.
Interesting--to me anyway--since I enjoyed Ashley's book but not Duran's. Apparently even writing styles are subject to taste even though in a long-ago thread on Potpourri, storytelling won hands down over writing.
Strangely enough, while I was fairly alone for favoring writing then, I liked Duran's story over her writing while some preferred her writing but had credibility issues with the heroine.
Just goes to show you have to take it one book at a time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xina

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 6628 Location: minneapolis
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Eliza wrote: |
I think this is supported by the main wrap-up to Hart's darkness--as the driving force in many aspects of his life--in what happened to him in London at the end, and neatly underscored by the scene with his father's portrait at home in Scotland.
The closing love scenes also reflected darkness as about fear and trust, and not only sexual gymnastics. Yes, sex is a potent part of being Hart Mackenzie' certainly, but just a part since it was another area he used his power and controlling personality.
That's my take anyway. |
Yes, this...I agree. In my opinion, this book is about Hart finding Eleanor again, a woman that makes him feel safe, a woman he lost when he was younger and not as wise in life. Loved the scenes with Ian, the brother that needed saving and he was always in debt to Hart. So many of the scenes were heart-wrenching. I read the scene where Hart was in the tomb of his wife and child where he was tracing the names with his finger. I was on a car trip listening to The Light by Sarah Bareilles while reading this scene, and it broke my heart. So...I have to say that I loved this book. I never thought Ashley would write Hart's sexual preferences, and I was satisfied in the way it was presented. The love story between Hart and Eleanor was the center of the story. Loved it. _________________ "As you wish"
~The Princess Bride |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisReader
Joined: 05 Sep 2009 Posts: 685
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I liked this book a lot -but then again I didn't have any preconceived notions of what Hart's proclivities were or how I wanted them to be. I was going along for the ride to see where Ashley was going and quite frankly I didn't care for the Hart we saw in the first book at all. I'm glad that his story took place when he was at a different point in his life. It also made sense to me that seeing Ian evolve and grow through his relationship with Beth would have a profound effect on Hart. As each of his brothers matured and worked through their demons, finding happiness with their wives, Hart would have felt marginalized to a degree and it makes sense he would have looked back to what he saw as the happiest time in his life and the woman he felt was the "one."
I really liked how Ashley conveyed how much Hart and Eleanor still thought of each other through the years. I'm surprised no one else mentioned the letter Hart sent Eleanor which was not only a doozy but incredibly trusting of him considering they were not even speaking at the time. I thought it was sad and very telling he thought she was the only one he could confess to about it and how confident he was in her that he could put such a confession in writing!
A lot of people have said they didn't think Eleanor had a very good reason for breaking off the engagement with Hart and here I have to disagree again. Eleanor had Hart's supposed ex-mistress come and tell her how she had devoted her life to his whims and desires and that he was still colluding with her about the best way to "catch" Eleanor. Her entire courtship was planned by Hart, essentially as a scheme. On top of that she knew he had dismissed the woman who had been so essential to him for years and built her life around him (we the readers know the woman in unbalanced and evil because of what happened "years later" with Beth but all Eleanor knows is there is this woman Hart has essentially washed his hands of). I don't think it's crazy of Eleanor to doubt his feelings, sincerity and whether she is just the next rung on his ladder. Maybe in a few years his "needs" would change again? Add to that his appalling behavior when she was breaking up with him and quite frankly I would have run away from him. When he should have been trying to rebuild their trust he was threatening her and her father. Again- I'm glad that's not the Hart we saw in this book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xina

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 6628 Location: minneapolis
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ChrisReader wrote: |
I thought it was sad and very telling he thought she was the only one he could confess to about it and how confident he was in her that he could put such a confession in writing!
A lot of people have said they didn't think Eleanor had a very good reason for breaking off the engagement with Hart and here I have to disagree again. Eleanor had Hart's supposed ex-mistress come and tell her how she had devoted her life to his whims and desires and that he was still colluding with her about the best way to "catch" Eleanor. Her entire courtship was planned by Hart, essentially as a scheme. On top of that she knew he had dismissed the woman who had been so essential to him for years and built her life around him (we the readers know the woman in unbalanced and evil because of what happened "years later" with Beth but all Eleanor knows is there is this woman Hart has essentially washed his hands of). I don't think it's crazy of Eleanor to doubt his feelings, sincerity and whether she is just the next rung on his ladder. Maybe in a few years his "needs" would change again? Add to that his appalling behavior when she was breaking up with him and quite frankly I would have run away from him. When he should have been trying to rebuild their trust he was threatening her and her father. Again- I'm glad that's not the Hart we saw in this book. |
Yes..the letter to Eleanor was very telling of his feelings toward her. And the scrapbook showed him that she had thought of him through all the years.
I thought that Eleanor had a perfect reason for leaving him. And the younger Hart thought he could threaten her, when it was clear she was slipping through his fingers. I saw that as an act of desperation on his part. _________________ "As you wish"
~The Princess Bride |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xina

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 6628 Location: minneapolis
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see that there are 2 more books planned in this series...whoo hoo! So, I know who Daniel (the last book) but who is Juliana (or Elliot) in the next book? _________________ "As you wish"
~The Princess Bride |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eliza
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
From Ashley's web site, a list of Mackenzie men, including:
Daniel Mackenzie
Born in 1866, Daniel is the oldest son of Cameron Mackenzie. His mother dead, Daniel is more or less raised by all four Mackenzie brothers, and later, Isabella. Cameron considered himself to be a bad father, but Daniel enjoyed growing up in a houseful of bachelors and retained a good humor. He loves the horses his father raises, but he also has a love for science and engineering.
Watching what happened with his father and uncles in terms of marriage, the good and the bad, Daniel is determined not to marry until he meets his soul mate.
Elliot McBride
Elliot McBride is the third oldest of the McBride clan, one of four brothers to Ainsley Douglas (heroine of The Many Sins of Lord Cameron). Elliot goes to India with the army, then leaves the service but stays in India to start a business helping other colonials settle there. During this time, he is captured and held in prison for nearly a year, often starved, often tortured, and forgotten by his captors for long stretches of time. The one thing he remembers is Juliana St. John, a lovely young woman he loved from afar in his youth but who unfortunately is to marry another.
When Elliot finally escapes from prison and returns to Scotland, he finds that his mind is broken--he suffers backflashes and other episodes he can't explain. Determined to regain his sanity, Elliot returns to India to face his fears, but travels back home to Scotland to start his life anew, beginning with attending the wedding of his beloved Juliana.
http://www.jennifersromances.com/NewSite/Mackenzies/characterbio.html#elliot
The following link also has family trees etc.
http://www.jennifersromances.com/NewSite/Mackenzies/mackenzie_main.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xina

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 6628 Location: minneapolis
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Eliza! I'm happy this series is continuing. _________________ "As you wish"
~The Princess Bride |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eliza
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Warning! This is l-o-n-g and has spoilers.
After letting the books and the discussion settle for a while, I had a smack my palm to my forehead moment about something that wasn't mentioned in this thread. Maybe it was thought of, but it seems to me we danced around it with various parts (kink, Eleanor, Ian/Hart, stand alone, etc.), and that's the arc of the story and the theme developed through all four books with all four brothers, with Ian and Hart rightly being the main pillars of the series. This wasn't just another family series where each gets his turn.
The main through-thread as I see it now is the father, always the father, and what results from him. And the main thing about these stories is all about control, or lack thereof, and not sex at all. How the characters' sex lives unfold is a key to each character, but not the whole or even the main event. And it's no accident that Ian's story is first and Hart's last.
Ian is the youngest and he has a condition that gives him the least control, while Hart's position as the oldest brother and heir drives him to assume the most responsibility and power.
Ian can't communicate as others and has rages he learns to control. He's first at his father's mercy, and then beholden to Hart, so the control in his life is mainly to shut down or walk away. But to my mind the most powerful, memorable scene in the first book is when Ian and Beth make love and Ian stares directly into her eyes. That was the telling moment to me. Sex at that time was how he could communicate best--and he grows with his marriage and expands to the rest of his life through to the last book.
Hart is the other pole: he has all the power and controls all he can--including saving Ian's life, and what all that went with that. Control is always the first and the last thing with Hart, and sex is just another part of that--not the key point. If you re-read the books, you'll see how often the gossip pages and his reputation play to his benefit for controlling whatever he wants.
Remember how often his mask is mentioned too? The young Eleanor jilts him not because of his mistress or the house, but because she doesn't want to be broken by Hart after hearing what the mistress has to say. The author says that outright. And Eleanor worries about that again later on by the way Hart goes back to maneuvering their wedding after being briefly so open and needy with her.
It's his last adventures where his outward control is stripped forcibly from him, leaving him control of only his own reactions (not the same but somewhat like where Ian had been), leading to his newer view of all of life that is around him. If you didn't catch the obvious redemption images, Ashley also spells them out in text afterwards.
In Hart's last love scene, the author also spells out it is about love and trust above all else.
And to close the circle, the author has a final scene with Hart and the father's portrait. And the new life of all the men is shown not just in the final, all-together-happy-family event, but in those portraits accidentally taken where Ian and Hart are each looking directly into their children's eyes.
The other completed circle is that as Hart saved Ian, Ian was there to save Hart right back. Ian's appearances weren't coincidental or just guest appearances in Hart's book, which is why, I think, that several posters mentioned them as such wonderful parts of book 4.
As for the darkness theme with Hart, because these are romances, I think some readers may have looked at sex as a standard, oughta-be-there element, where I think the darkness is more about the father's lasting effect and what Hart had to do to save Ian, feeling he lost his soul in the process.
This is already long so I won't go into the middle brothers' different but also similar issues.
On a side note, when Eloisa James, Julia Quinn and Connie Brockway were writing The Lady Most Likely, one of them said on Facebook that in working together, they'd come to think that most romances were somehow or somewhere based on parenting. I found that interesting, and it has made me thoughtful of how often that is true.
So...thank you if you got this far in my long-winded post.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaneO
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 755
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
@Eliza
Excellent analysis. I think you are right, and this is one of those instances when reading the entire series in sequence is necessary to fully appreciate it. That is something that usually annoys me, but in this case I have no objections. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xina

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 6628 Location: minneapolis
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JaneO wrote: | @Eliza
Excellent analysis. I think you are right, and this is one of those instances when reading the entire series in sequence is necessary to fully appreciate it. That is something that usually annoys me, but in this case I have no objections. |
I totally agree. I think the books can be read alone, but to get the full picture of the family, it is probably better to read them all, and in order. _________________ "As you wish"
~The Princess Bride |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eggletina
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LouiseAAR wrote: | Update!!
Ok, Cam's book down, and I am totally sticking to the review! Though, the only difference is that the "back story" I thought was in the previous books really isn't there either. The concern remains the same. By the time I understood Eleanor, I didn't like her or want to care for her. That is the root of my problem with the book. Now, having read the other books, I am ok that Hart may not be fully explained here - he is the recurring character that some affinity for can be assumed as it is a series. And honestly, I liked him from the start of Book 4. But Eleanor doesn't have that advantage and I still can't get over some of her actions. I am rereading The Duke's Perfect Wife and I will be eager to discuss with you all when you get your copies!  |
I finished The Duke's Perfect Wife this morning and agree that Eleanor is a weak link in Hart's story. I like her well enough as an individual, but I felt there was far too much telling rather than showing with their backstory (which in my opinion happens a lot in what I've read by this author -- e.g. characters are constantly reminding you Hart is an ass, or so-and-so is this way, etc., to the point of hammering you over the head with it when we also can see this by their actions, behavior, etc.).
Anyway...
What I liked: like so many others, the scenes between Hart and Ian. For me the most interesting hook in the series has been the relationships between the brothers, their own personal growth, and as Eliza so eloquently pointed out how their father's treatment of them affected their lives.
I was lukewarm about the romance between Hart and Eleanor. I also felt the author wanted to have it both ways with how she characterized Eleanor. There was much water under the bridge, so on one hand it felt like they were picking up as tentative friends after all these years but on the other hand there is this estrangement to resolve that really turned out not to be as much of an issue. Eleanor is already treated like a member of the family. I agree with Shelf's point that:
| Quote: | | Also, I found that she was far too accepting about things (i.e. the past) and that it meant there was virtually no tension between her and Hart throughout, especially when the meet at the start after all these years it was just very bland. |
I didn't feel like we experienced enough of the Eleanor's emotional struggles and thawing out to really be able to relate to her as well as Hart or for her to feel as developed as Hart (but I realize this is very much his story and his journey). We definitely were privy to her thoughts, her behind the scenes way of keeping up with him and carrying a torch all these years, but the way what kept them apart was explained and resolved never played out in a way that was very believable to me.
Another minor issue I had was that I felt the domineering, controlled head of family type has been done better. Let's compare Hart to someone like Balogh's Wulfric, e.g. I think as Wulfric is developed throughout the series he stays consistently true to the character the author has established and the HEA doesn't waffle or change who he is. By comparison, I think Ashley is rather wish-washy in her approach to character sometimes. Characters often behave in ways to support the plot developments, e.g., rather than adhering to the basic consistency of their own nature--or so it seems to me (hope that makes sense).
All that said, I will admit that I may have missed out on some important developments in the overall character arcs (esp regarding Eleanor), though, as I only read the first book and this one, but Louise's comments made me feel like I really hadn't missed out by not reading books #2 and #3. I dunno. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eliza
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I enjoyed reading your thoughts, Eggletina. Would you mind if we discuss a couple further?
| Quote: | | Another minor issue I had was that I felt the domineering, controlled head of family type has been done better. Let's compare Hart to someone like Balogh's Wulfric, e.g. I think as Wulfric is developed throughout the series he stays consistently true to the character the author has established and the HEA doesn't waffle or change who he is. By comparison, I think Ashley is rather wish-washy in her approach to character sometimes. Characters often behave in ways to support the plot developments, e.g., rather than adhering to the basic consistency of their own nature--or so it seems to me (hope that makes sense). |
Funny, but I may be the only Balogh fan on the planet that didn't love Wulfric as many others did. My view on consistency of character is different, I think: I don't think people IRL act always just the same, so when a fictional character is too "in line" all the time, I'm reminded that this is a created character since even the most placid or controlled of folks do something odd from time to time. The point of a character with control issues is their underlying fear of lack of control, so I think showing some hints of vulnerability is a good thing for character development.
The other thing is that the aim of the Mackenzie books is to see the brothers grow away from their awful past into fuller, better lives. Hart has the most symbolically staged conversion, but they all grow. Isn't that what people are supposed to do?
| Quote: | | ...but Louise's comments made me feel like I really hadn't missed out by not reading books #2 and #3. I dunno. |
Many people loved Cam, while Mac's bigger than life, exuberant personality caught me. While Ian was a no-control person and Hart a totally in control person, the middle brothers Cam and Mac were varieties of out of control people. Isn't it generally thought that middle children get less attention than the oldest and youngest? which I thought was perfect for these two and their part in the series arc.
The other thing I forgot to mention that I loved is when Ian (I think it was) explains how the brothers are all crazy, each in their own unique way. And by extension, I took that to mean all people have weak spots or character flaws--even without a diagnosis--since we're all mortal humans. Ian is just more visible is the point. I loved that as another summing up in book 4.
As for Eleanor, I guess I have to think a little more since I liked her ever so much more than a number of posters here. But then, I saw these books as stories about the transformations of four men, with their women playing key roles indeed, but much more in support roles than usual romances. The women are the steadier figures than the men for a nice change.
ETA: I forgot something major. The "control" issue of the books isn't meant to be seen through a psychological lens or filter; it's about how an individual conducts his life. This is summed up at the end of book 4 too when Hart is on the river and has his moment of understanding that life goes on with or without his controlling things. The river is usually a symbol for life passing, and if we choose to float, paddle with or against the tide; IOW, the choices and decisions we make--or don't make--for what happens in our lives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eggletina
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Eliza wrote: | My view on consistency of character is different, I think: I don't think people IRL act always just the same, so when a fictional character is too "in line" all the time, I'm reminded that this is a created character since even the most placid or controlled of folks do something odd from time to time. The point of a character with control issues is their underlying fear of lack of control, so I think showing some hints of vulnerability is a good thing for character development.
|
I don't disagree with that, and I've certainly read books where I've felt the character's transformation/growth/sudden epiphany about oneself has been convincingly done. The author actually took Hart where he needed to be for his HEA, but I'm not sure the journey to getting there was done as convincingly as I needed it to be. It was unclear to me just how long Hart spent in hiding before realizing the world was getting along just fine without him. However, I like seeing what authors do with these domineering characters, so I was glad to read Hart's story. I really need to go back and re-read Ian's story (and the middle books) before I can judge that fairly, though. It's been a few years since I read Ian's story and I'm not sure I can trust my memory. I realize part of this is finally being able to be in Hart's head and seeing him through Eleanor's eyes. However, I have too many books in my reading queue to do that anytime soon.
I do think Hart is a character full of contradictions which is part of what makes his journey an interesting one to follow. He is interesting to compare and contrast to Wulfric because they have common traits, but also are very different, especially in their personalities and how they deal with people in general. Hart is much more blustery.
Did anyone else find themselves wishing there was a timeline posted somewhere for this series? I was constantly trying to establish when certain events occurred, how old the characters were at such time, etc. Most of the information is spread out across the four books. It would be nice if one existed (I haven't checked the author's website). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eliza
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for replying, Eggletina. It's really great to see through others' eyes and be able to swap ideas. I really enjoyed reading your posts.
| Quote: | | ... It was unclear to me just how long Hart spent in hiding before realizing the world was getting along just fine without him. |
It was unclear to me too, and I kept thinking of poor Eleanor and his family not knowing what happened to him.
| Quote: | | I really need to go back and re-read Ian's story (and the middle books) before I can judge that fairly, though. It's been a few years since I read Ian's story and I'm not sure I can trust my memory. I realize part of this is finally being able to be in Hart's head and seeing him through Eleanor's eyes. However, I have too many books in my reading queue to do that anytime soon. |
I wasn't going to go back either because of my TBRs, but I caved and went back because of not trusting my memory either.
| Quote: | | I do think Hart is a character full of contradictions which is part of what makes his journey an interesting one to follow. He is interesting to compare and contrast to Wulfric because they have common traits, but also are very different, especially in their personalities and how they deal with people in general. Hart is much more blustery. |
I thought this an excellent point, especially because so many books have undeveloped or unexplained domineering men with the only transformation being their finally realizing they actually can love!
| Quote: | | Did anyone else find themselves wishing there was a timeline posted somewhere for this series? |
Not a timeline but here is a family tree below with some dates. I started with the awful father Daniel and also included a bit on Hart so we know that he was...
"Born 1844. Inherits the Kilmorgan Dukedom in 1874 at age 30; the same day he releases his youngest brother, Ian, from the asylum in which their father had imprisoned him. Hart proposed to and was jilted by Lady Eleanor Ramsay in 1871. He marries Lady Sarah Graham (a duke’s daughter) in 1875. A timid, frail creature, Lady Sarah dies in 1876 in childbirth, and the child is stillborn."
I believe his wife had been gone a couple of years and there was a mention in the book about maybe six years or so passing since Eleanor jilted him, so that would make the start of book 4 around 1878/9 (?), which fits with Gladstone in politics, his reforms and The Irish Question.
" In 1869 Parliament enacted his Disestablishment Bill for the Church of Ireland; in 1870, his Irish Land Act." And: "There was an agricultural depression, and Irish discontent flared up as the biggest issue for Gladstone. An Irish Protestant lawyer named Isaac Butt had organized the Irish Home Government Association, and his cohorts won 50 seats in the 1874 election." Also: "Violence became endemic in Ireland, especially after the bad harvest of 1879, and Conservatives called for more coercion bills, which included curfews and imprisoning people without having to file charges. Gladstone insisted that violence must be stopped, so he approved the 1881 Coercion Act, and he ordered Parnell jailed for stirring Irish peasants against his proposed new Irish Land Act—the feisty Irishman remained in jail for a year. Gladstone believed peace would come to Ireland only when feudalism ended and peasants had a meaningful stake in their work. Accordingly, he threw his energies into the Irish Land Act, passed in 1881."
Since the other brothers are settled before Hart with Eleanor, the stories start 1874 or later since Hart is Duke and Ian is free in book 1.
Daniel Mackenzie, 1824-1874
(13th Duke of Kilmorgan )
(1st Duke of Kilmorgan, English from 1855)
= m. Elspeth Cameron (d. 1864)
|
(1) Hart Mackenzie, 1844
14th Duke of Kilmorgan 1874
(2nd Duke of Kilmorgan, English)
= m 1. Lady Sarah Graham (d. 1876)
>> son (Hart Graham Mackenzie, d. 1876)
|
(2) Cameron Mackenzie, 1846
= m1. Lady Elizabeth Cavendish (d. 1866)
>> son Daniel Mackenzie
|
(3) “Mac” (Roland Ferdinand) Mackenzie 1851
= Lady Isabella Scranton
|
(4) Ian Mackenzie 1854 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordRose

Joined: 25 Mar 2012 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Eliza wrote: |
"Born 1844. Inherits the Kilmorgan Dukedom in 1874 at age 30; the same day he releases his youngest brother, Ian, from the asylum in which their father had imprisoned him. Hart proposed to and was jilted by Lady Eleanor Ramsay in 1871. He marries Lady Sarah Graham (a duke’s daughter) in 1875. A timid, frail creature, Lady Sarah dies in 1876 in childbirth, and the child is stillborn."
I believe his wife had been gone a couple of years and there was a mention in the book about maybe six years or so passing since Eleanor jilted him, so that would make the start of book 4 around 1878/9 (?), which fits with Gladstone in politics, his reforms and The Irish.
|
Actually, if I remember correctly, his wife had been dead for eight years, and it had been over a decade since Eleanor left him (about 12 years, I think.) Eleanor says she's in her 30s, and since she was 20 when she met Hart, and I think he was 27, she would be 32 and he would be about 39 in the book. I'm pretty sure the book takes place in 1884, which, if Hart was born in 1844 as the family tree says, makes him 39 or 40, which fits with what I remember from reading.
Approximate time line
1844 - Hart born
1851 - Eleanor born
1871 - Hart and Eleanor meet, get engaged, then get unengaged
1874 - Hart inherits dukedom
1875 - Hart marries Lady Sarah
1876 - Hart's wife and son die
1884 - The Duke's Perfect Wife events
I tend to be excessively timeline-conscious while reading, and it really bothers me if I can't figure out the characters' ages.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|