The Virgin's War
Grade : A

The Virgin’s War is the final book in Laura Andersen’s Tudor Legacy series and the sixth book to take place in the alternate Tudor timeline that she set up back in The Boleyn King, book one of her compelling Boleyn Trilogy. In that series, Anne Boleyn had given Henry VIII a son who lived to succeed him; and the current one picks up some twenty years later, with Elizabeth I having followed her brother to the throne. Mind you, this is no Virgin Queen; here, Elizabeth married – and later divorced - Philip of Spain and had a daughter by him, Anne Isabella (Anabel), Princess of Wales.

With the current vogue for books in series which also work as standalones, it can be tricky to review a book in which it is necessary to have read the others in the set without giving away too much – so there are bound to be spoilers for The Virgin’s Daughter and The Virgin’s Spy in this review.

It’s over two decades since Henry VIII’s reformation, and the political situation in England is still dominated by the religious divide between the Protestants and the Roman Catholics. Much of the action in The Virgin’s Spy takes place in Ireland, where English forces are fighting Catholic rebels who have the support of Mary, Queen of Scots. In this universe, Mary escaped from captivity in England and has subsequently married Philip of Spain, thus uniting two of the most important Catholic monarchs in Europe. Philip has had his eye on the conquest of England for some time, but in spite of the continual urging of his wife, he is prepared to wait for the right moment to invade. When news reaches him that Princess Anne and her mother have become estranged and almost openly opposed to each other, he realises that the time to strike is almost at hand. With Anne building her power-base in the north and making concerted efforts to win the hearts and minds of the people there, it seems as though there will be a royal rebellion soon, and Philip plans to take advantage of the split between mother and daughter to invade England. He knows the English will never accept him as king, but now there is Anne, young, lovely and widely beloved, who is obviously sympathetic to the Catholic cause and who, he believes will bring her country back to the true faith.

But Elizabeth and Anabel are two fiercely intelligent, politically astute women and they are playing a long game. At the suggestion of Pippa Courtenay, Anabel’s closest friend and adviser, Anabel makes the move north to Middleham Castle (Richard III’s former home and stronghold) and begins to court the approval of the region’s Catholics by recruiting two of the most high profile of them to her Council. Anabel and her mother deliberately maintain the fiction of an estrangement and take care to have little contact with each other; and over the next couple of years, they carefully orchestrate their preparations for England’s defence.

Laura Andersen has impressed me once again with her meticulous research and her talent for interweaving the threads of her alternative history so cleverly in and out of the existing tapestry of historical fact. Yet for all her skill in mapping out these momentous events, she doesn’t lose sight of the personal stories that are so closely woven through the larger political canvas. Minuette and Dominic Courtenay, Elizabeth’s oldest friends, have roles to play, as do their four children, Lucette, Stephen and the twins Kit and Pippa. Lucette’s story was told in The Virgin’s Daughter and Stephen’s in The Virgin’s Spy, but they have prominent parts here, especially Stephen, who was stripped of his titles and banished from England as a result of his actions in the previous book. Pippa is a mystic and has the gift of second sight; it’s she who sets Anabel’s plan in motion by suggesting she move north, and she who is instrumental in rallying support among the towns and villages of the region. Pippa and Kit share one of those unusual mental bonds so often found between twins, but the strain of keeping some of the things she knows from her brother is starting to weigh very heavy on Pippa and her strength is failing. Meanwhile Kit and Anabel are struggling with the depth of their feelings for each other; a princess cannot marry where she chooses and they have always known this - but with a Spanish invasion imminent, Anabel must do whatever she can to help to secure the throne.

This is a deliciously complex story that builds gradually and reaches a breathless climax that is full of both triumph and sorrow. Ms Andersen has created a set of wonderful characters for whom I came to care and whose joys and heartbreak (seriously – I cried more than once) I experienced right along with them. She does a terrific job with the characterisation of Elizabeth in particular, exploring the burden of sovereignty, her necessary isolation and how she continues to face decisions head on, no matter how difficult they may be. I enjoyed the insights into her relationship with her two closest advisors – Burleigh and Walsingham – and her long-term and sometimes uneasy friendship with Minuette Courtenay. And if, like me, you fell a little bit in love with Dominic in the first trilogy, you’ll be pleased to see him at Elizabeth’s side once more as he responds to her call to arms and takes his place as one of the nation’s most trusted and respected military leaders.

Unlike the earlier Boleyn Trilogy, however, this one ends firmly in its alternate timeline, which feels perfectly right given the struggles and personal tragedies this set of characters has endured in order to get there. Perhaps it’s a teeny bit too perfect, but by the time I reached the epilogue I really didn’t care. I was so strongly caught up in the story and the experiences of the characters had impacted upon me so viscerally that I felt they absolutely deserved the ending they got. The Virgin’s War is a splendid end to another superbly written and researched trilogy by this author, and I am eagerly awaiting whatever she comes up with next.

Reviewed by Caz Owens
Grade : A

Sensuality: Kisses

Review Date : July 10, 2016

Publication Date: 07/2016

Review Tags: Tudor

Recent Comments …

Caz Owens

I’m a musician, teacher and mother of two gorgeous young women who are without doubt, my finest achievement :)I’ve gravitated away from my first love – historical romance – over the last few years and now read mostly m/m romances in a variety of sub-genres. I’ve found many fantastic new authors to enjoy courtesy of audiobooks - I probably listen to as many books as I read these days – mostly through glomming favourite narrators and following them into different genres.And when I find books I LOVE, I want to shout about them from the (metaphorical) rooftops to help other readers and listeners to discover them, too.

16 Comments

  1. Thanks for the great review, Caz. I’m intrigued by the setting— a salt farm is definitely new to me, and I love learning about new occupations and all that is involved. I really enjoyed Hill’s Two Tribes, so I will look forward to this one.

    1. I hope you enjoy it – she’s one of the very few CR authors whose books I look forward to these days and who can be relied upon to do something a bit different.

  2. Great review! I agree with the general concensus that Hill is hitting her stride and writes books that break the (rather tired) contemporary m/m mold. I’ve given every book I’ve read by her a B, so she’s a very reliable author for me. This is on my TBR list, but I’m thinking it might not be one I read anytime soon with the level of angst centering around mental health issues. I’m getting a backlog of “angsty books” I really want to read, so I think I definitely need to go on a vacation by myself to a beautiful, restful Island and just read. :-D Think my husband will mind??

  3. Just a small comment on the overall wonderful review of an author I appreciate a lot.
    I am surprised that you call 29-39 a May-December romance. I would have expected 20-ies and 50-ies. Obviously, I am not up to date on where the ick- level is today.

    1. Actually, I’ve almost always used the term May/Dec and age-gap interchangeably – I don’t remember ‘age-gap’ being a defined trope until fairly recently.
      It’s completely arbitrary on my part – Mr Caz is 7 years older than I am, so that’s ‘normal’ to me!

    2. I got curious and I found this quote about May-December romances (irl):
      A May-December romance is a relationship with a significant age gap.

      • Specifically, social psychologists define this type of relationship as one in which one partner is at least 10 years older than the other. In some of these relationships, though, the age gap is even larger—as much as 20 or 30 years.[1]In heterosexual May-December partnerships, the older partner is usually the man. The woman is the older partner in only about 1% of these relationships.
      • Around 8% of male-female couples in Western countries have an age gap of 10 years or more, as well as 25% of male-male couples and 15% of female-female couples.

      I think it’s interesting that 25% of m/m couples have 10 years or more between them, and 15% of f/f couples. It shows there’s still a stigma against it in heterosexual couples. Maybe because the male-female power imbalances make it feel more icky?

      1. Or, that the age of childbearing doesn’t matter.
        Almost every m/m couple I’m close to has an age gap of 10 to 20 years. In the f/f couples I know, there’s less of that.

        1. Could be part of it, but it can’t totally be that. You’d think then it would be even more common in m/f couples because childbearing age is limited by the woman’s age, not the man’s. In other words, if the ability to have children was the push, then it seems more men marrying younger women would be more common, not less.

          I also think large age gaps in m/f relationships still has a lot of baggage associated with it in real life. The women in these relationships are often judged as “golddiggers,” and the men as having a midlife crisis or being predatory, especially if the brides are very young. I believe you once said you didn’t care for large age gaps right? I think a lot of people feel that way. I’d have a much harder time reading about it in m/f books than in LGBTQ books, but for me it’s the possiblity gender-related power imbalances that makes me wary (which also bothers me a lot in m/f relationships with no age-gap).

              1. I meant: I do not mind age gaps. They often signal of a power imbalance, which I mind. Older, richer, well connected, emotionally less needy/more stable… these were often part of older m/f romances with age gaps. So, when an age gap is present, I am happy when there is no power imbalance.

                I need to be shown in the book that it is love, and for me, power imbalances nearly always negate love. So the sweet poor innocent who loves the older mafia boss while being utterly in his power may feel that this is a great romance, I do not.

  4. Fearne Hill has become an auto-buy author for me and this book is on my Amazon wish list. The summary provided sounded a bit odd so I’m glad to now have a better understanding of the plot. It kind of reminds me of the Rossingley series, which I did love. Thanks for the review!

    1. She’s getting better and better – and is one of the few authors of contemporaries who manages to find different angles and doesn’t just rehash all the tired old tropes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *